Intel Core i3-3220 Dual-Core Processor 3.3 Ghz 3 MB Cache LGA 1155 – BX80637i33220

  • Low Price Guarantee
  • Free Super Saver Shipping
  • One-Day Shipping

Intel Core i3-3220 Dual-Core Processor 3.3 Ghz 3 MB Cache LGA 1155 – BX80637i33220

http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/21YCLe-puDL._SL160_.jpg

  • L3 Cache
  • Ivy Bridge
  • Socket 1155

Intel Core i3-3220 Processor 3.30 GHz, 22nm, 3 MB L3 Cache, Intel Hyper-Threading Technology , Intel HD Graphics 2500, LGA1155 package – Ivy Bridge
Core Processor
Intel Core i3-3220 Dual-Core Processor 3.3 Ghz 3 MB Cache LGA 1155 – BX80637i33220

List Price: $ 129.99

Price:

  • Other Recommendations
  • Best Selling Products
  • Product Reviews
  • Feedback

3 thoughts on “Intel Core i3-3220 Dual-Core Processor 3.3 Ghz 3 MB Cache LGA 1155 – BX80637i33220

  1. 3 of 3 people found the following review helpful
    5.0 out of 5 stars
    nice budget gaming CPU, September 27, 2012
    By 
    wqerty

    Amazon Verified Purchase(What’s this?)
    This review is from: Intel Core i3-3220 Dual-Core Processor 3.3 Ghz 3 MB Cache LGA 1155 – BX80637i33220 (Personal Computers)

    Built a budget rig today, this with an 7850, 8 gig of memory and 120G SSD pretty much handles everything I can throw at it.
    If you are really on a budget I recommend getting this instead of an i5 and put the extra 100$ in a better video card, which makes all the differences. This won’t be a bottleneck for most of the games.

    Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 

    Was this review helpful to you? Yes
    No

  2. 3 of 3 people found the following review helpful
    5.0 out of 5 stars
    A Nice Little Gem, September 27, 2012
    By 
    aniview

    This review is from: Intel Core i3-3220 Dual-Core Processor 3.3 Ghz 3 MB Cache LGA 1155 – BX80637i33220 (Personal Computers)

    In my quest to build a quality gaming PC on a budget I stumbled upon the i3-3220. It’s a powerful current generation processor that will ensure your system is future proofed for several years to come. For $5 you get a 10% improvement in performance over last year’s i3-2120 so, why not? I bought this off Newegg but there are no reviews up on Amazon, so I’ll give you one!

    While there are games out that can utilize four cores there aren’t a whole lot of them out there. Including new releases you’ll be able to play 99% of what’s out on maximum settings providing you have the graphics card to match. The only titles that won’t stay at a consistent 60+ fps are games like Battlefield 3 where you have enormous 64 player games.

    In my Steam library the most graphic intensive games I have are the Crysis games, a heavily modded Skyrim, Arkham City, and Max Payne 3. So far, they’ve all been at a consistent 60+ fps with everything turned up. I know for a fact the upcoming titles I’m interested in (Black Ops 2, Tomb Raider, Crysis 3) will play the same.

    So, if you’re on a budget and want to save the $100 I can safely recommend this over the 3570K. You also save money on a third party heat sink. At idle I’m seeing 28-33c and 60ish on a full load. I’m very happy with this purchase.

    My Build:
    Gigabyte GA-Z77-D3H
    Intel Core i3-3220
    G. Skill Ares Series 8GB (2×4) RAM
    HIS Iceq X 7850 (OC’d)

    Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 

    Was this review helpful to you? Yes
    No

  3. 5.0 out of 5 stars
    All most will need, October 8, 2012
    By 

    This review is from: Intel Core i3-3220 Dual-Core Processor 3.3 Ghz 3 MB Cache LGA 1155 – BX80637i33220 (Personal Computers)

    I picked up the 3220 to replace a G630 in a recent build nothing wrong with the Pentium chip just that the 3220 is so much better at all task. IMO unless your into maxed out gaming quad cores are a waste of money for home use. I coupled the 3220 with a mid range video card and 4gb of memory couldn’t be happier with the results with those components bought at sales I’m under the cost of a single good quality quad. The 2500 IG on the 3220 has gotten decent reviews so for high def. playback a video card is not needed. I use an external 3.0 USB HD, performance was not a step up but a leap forward with the 3220 compared to the 630. To top it off it uses ten watts less than the 630, a good value for a work horse of a processor.

    cons: The miserable excuse for a cooler Intel provides. I replaced it with an inexpensive 92mm aluminum after market unit it runs quiet and keeps the chip cool.

    Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 

    Was this review helpful to you? Yes
    No

Share your experience about this product